A few words on Libya, enslavement of Libya, and on so called Baltic States and the theory of “Occupation”
The Essence:
Russian Federation and the countries it can get on board
1) Should not approve any UN mandate for NATO or any third power to stay on the ground or enter Libya to "stabilize it" or сommit more murders.
2) Should condemn the US/NATO aggression against Libya and declare the UN mandate is abused and hence void.
3) Should not extend any recognition to the government imposed on Libyans by force and NATO airport
4) Should help to form Libyan government in exile and maintain the premise that Libya is now occupied. The Libyan government in exile can be based in South Africa.
5) Prepare an international convention on regime change – or change of government imposed by a colonial power as defined by aggressor power or coalition of powers which do not share a natural border with the victim state, under which any alternation of government produced by force or threat of use of force (repeating Vienna convention) convention such as occurred in Libya and Iraq will not be recognized. Even if the USA and NATO vultures would abstain from such a convention, the rest of the world would sign up.
The Summary:
After self-dissolution of the Soviet Union, the USA and some of its NATO vassals revived a myth of the Baltic occupation. Supposedly the so-called Baltic States were incorporated in the USSR because the USSR threatened to use force unless left governments are brought into power. Consequently the USA and the UK now claim they never recognized incorporation of the Baltic States within the Soviet Union. Even if the USSR did threaten to use force, the threat was not illegal from the standpoint of international law as it existed in the 1940. Only the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) outlawed threat of use of force in international relations (which makes all agreements signed by the USA and its vassals, by the NATO and even by the UN with nations as diverse and far apart geographically from each other as Serbia and Afghanistan null and void).
Although the USA did not recognize peaceful Baltic unification within the Soviet Union, and that was wrong, the right thing to do for Russia and other non-allied states it can muster around, would be to put forward a notion, which can then be codified into international law, that no new government of a nation or territory that was changed by an outside force or a coalition of states with which the said nation shares no borders, i.e. by an act of direct colonial aggression disguised as a mission to protect civilians, would ever be recognized as legitimate. Furthermore all nations where change of government occurred due to or with assistance of military action by third states or coalition of states with which the nation where change of government occurred shares no common border, i.e in the course of colonial action, would be considered occupied. Furthermore an election held in presence of the foreign forces should be considered illegitimate as it is conducted under threat of use of force.
Using similar logic
Russia (and China and any other states such as members of the African Union) should not recognize new foreign-imposed governments of Libya and withdraw recognition from governments which were created through foreign occupation (namely the government of today's Afghanistan). Russia, China, Africa Union should help establish governments in exile for Libya and other states wrecked by NATO and deny the occupiers the legitimacy they so crave for.
The Story of the Baltic Occupation:
In the 1940 Soviet armed forces entered Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, all three territories were former Russian provinces, and not independent countries in any historic sense except perhaps for Lithuania which might have existed like mythical Israel of yore (the modern state of Israel bases its claims to the lands underneath it on... Biblical evidence) or as a part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and a footnote in the Eastern European history of the Late Middle Ages. Neither Latvia nor Estonia had any historical record of existence and in case of Latvia did not even appear as a geographical concept until the end of the First World War when both Estonia and Latvia were created in a plot of local ethnic nationalists (future ethno-Nazis, in case of Estonia it is even today run by ethnic Nazis) and Bolsheviks. The only power which recognized Estonia and Latvia at the time were two bandits – Lenin and Trotsky. The legitimacy of those ethnic states formed in the Russian lands is based on the original Leninist recognition.
In 1939 three by the then time fascist statelets signed pacts of mutual defense with the Soviet Union. In 1940 – at the time of spectacular Nazi successes – Soviet Union insisted on establishing military bases in fascist ethnic statelets of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. No a shot was fired. After situation in Europe escalated, Paris fell to the Nazis (was declared an open city), the Soviet Union forced what amounted to ultimatum to the fascist governments in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania and brought about replacement of fascist governments with left ones,which after the referendum joined the Soviet Union. During all this time not a bomb fell and not a shot was fired.
Although the incorporation of the Baltic Republics was lawful, legal, historically just (as it was Russian state's territory) and although ethnic states are abomination in and by themselves, and although the unification of Baltic Provinces and the USSR was recognized at Yalta, Potsdam and later Helsinki (On Security and Cooperation in Europe, Final Act of 1975 which recognized borders of the Soviet Union as unchangeable and legal as they were of August 1, 1975; recognized by the United States as well), after the dissolution of the Soviet Union the Nazi monster reared its ugly head again. After the defeat of Germany in 1945, the United States assumed on the role of the Third Reich in respect to anti-Communism, in certain ways Americanism is Nazism as foundation of American power in Europe was based not on forces which fought Nazism but precisely on those which were allied with the Nazism. Needless to say most enthusiastic supporters of the United States are Nazis, that is obvious especially in Eastern Europe, from Croatia to Estonia.
One of the most hideous propaganda myth was the notion spread by American State Department and the Nazis (literally Estonian and Latvian Nazis who fled the justice for the safety of American protection, as the USA was always willing to help Nazis as it was ready to help Islamists if the fight against Russia - or in fact any independent state - was at stake) that somehow three Baltic territories (now called Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) were occupied by the Soviet Union.
Of course Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania were never occupied by the Soviet Union, but as a justification for the theory the USA propagandists and the Nazis put forth a theory that the incorporation in the USSR was less than lawful because threat (!) of use of force (though no actual force) might have been used to induce the statelets to bring left governments into power and abolish native fascist regimes which the USA would have preferred then as it does now. In 2008 the United States Senate even demanded that Russia “recognizes occupation of the Baltic states” (Something Russia cannot possibly do because there was no occupation, this is American Nazi propaganda canard).
Indeed in 1969 the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties was signed. As far as I know I know all members of the NATO are signatories of the treaty. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties states explicitly that force or threat of use of force makes any international agreement void - Article 52 - Coercion of a State by the threat or use of force 247 A treaty is void if its conclusion has been procured by the threat or use of force. This means of course that all treaties and agreements the American Nazis and their European vassals have “reached” in, with or in respect to Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Ivory Coast, Haiti Yugoslavia (as a historic entity), Serbia, Kosovo (a part of Serbia illegally occupied by NATO at this time), Bosnia, etc. are not worth the paper they are written on.
Soviet Union did not occupy Baltic States and even if even used a threat of force, if there was any as there is no evidence of such threat , this was not illegal under international law of the late 1940s.
The USA occupies Iraq and Afghanistan and the USA has destroyed peaceful, prosperous state of Libya that was no threat to anyone. The regime that is about to seize control of Libya was brought in to power through murder, by American drones and NATO bombers.
Russian Federation should not allow this crime to go either unpunished or unnoticed.
Of course, Russian Federation is used almost metaphorically, someone has to come forward, the Republic of South Africa is also a great candidate to unify Africa, the world and deny Nazi rats and colonialists the legitimacy they seek.
1) Russia (or any other third country like China or Venezuela) should not approve any UN mandate for stabilizing Libya and should use it veto power if necessary to stop any UN resolution on Libya that might somehow abet or aid USA and NATO in their task of enslaving that African nation and stealing its natural resources.
2) The ongoing US/NATO aggression against Libya should be condemned. Unconditionally and without any reservations as of. The original UN mandate for protecting civilians and establishing a non-fly zone was misused and abused.
3) Russia, China and non-aligned states should organize a diplomatic effort to deny any recognition to the would-be government of thugs, murderers and rapists which “succeeded” in destroying Libya with the help of NATO air power.
4) A Libyan government in exile should be formed (perhaps in the Republic of South Africa) and it should be maintained that Libya is occupied. No elections which resulted in campaign of bombing and murder should be considered legitimate.
5) We need an international convention on anti-colonialism, analogues to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties that would deny legitimacy to governments formed by or outright imported by imperialist powers and deny any legitimacy to elections held under duress or in presence of foreign troops.
The Essence:
Russian Federation and the countries it can get on board
1) Should not approve any UN mandate for NATO or any third power to stay on the ground or enter Libya to "stabilize it" or сommit more murders.
2) Should condemn the US/NATO aggression against Libya and declare the UN mandate is abused and hence void.
3) Should not extend any recognition to the government imposed on Libyans by force and NATO airport
4) Should help to form Libyan government in exile and maintain the premise that Libya is now occupied. The Libyan government in exile can be based in South Africa.
5) Prepare an international convention on regime change – or change of government imposed by a colonial power as defined by aggressor power or coalition of powers which do not share a natural border with the victim state, under which any alternation of government produced by force or threat of use of force (repeating Vienna convention) convention such as occurred in Libya and Iraq will not be recognized. Even if the USA and NATO vultures would abstain from such a convention, the rest of the world would sign up.
The Summary:
After self-dissolution of the Soviet Union, the USA and some of its NATO vassals revived a myth of the Baltic occupation. Supposedly the so-called Baltic States were incorporated in the USSR because the USSR threatened to use force unless left governments are brought into power. Consequently the USA and the UK now claim they never recognized incorporation of the Baltic States within the Soviet Union. Even if the USSR did threaten to use force, the threat was not illegal from the standpoint of international law as it existed in the 1940. Only the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) outlawed threat of use of force in international relations (which makes all agreements signed by the USA and its vassals, by the NATO and even by the UN with nations as diverse and far apart geographically from each other as Serbia and Afghanistan null and void).
Although the USA did not recognize peaceful Baltic unification within the Soviet Union, and that was wrong, the right thing to do for Russia and other non-allied states it can muster around, would be to put forward a notion, which can then be codified into international law, that no new government of a nation or territory that was changed by an outside force or a coalition of states with which the said nation shares no borders, i.e. by an act of direct colonial aggression disguised as a mission to protect civilians, would ever be recognized as legitimate. Furthermore all nations where change of government occurred due to or with assistance of military action by third states or coalition of states with which the nation where change of government occurred shares no common border, i.e in the course of colonial action, would be considered occupied. Furthermore an election held in presence of the foreign forces should be considered illegitimate as it is conducted under threat of use of force.
Using similar logic
Russia (and China and any other states such as members of the African Union) should not recognize new foreign-imposed governments of Libya and withdraw recognition from governments which were created through foreign occupation (namely the government of today's Afghanistan). Russia, China, Africa Union should help establish governments in exile for Libya and other states wrecked by NATO and deny the occupiers the legitimacy they so crave for.
The Story of the Baltic Occupation:
In the 1940 Soviet armed forces entered Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, all three territories were former Russian provinces, and not independent countries in any historic sense except perhaps for Lithuania which might have existed like mythical Israel of yore (the modern state of Israel bases its claims to the lands underneath it on... Biblical evidence) or as a part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and a footnote in the Eastern European history of the Late Middle Ages. Neither Latvia nor Estonia had any historical record of existence and in case of Latvia did not even appear as a geographical concept until the end of the First World War when both Estonia and Latvia were created in a plot of local ethnic nationalists (future ethno-Nazis, in case of Estonia it is even today run by ethnic Nazis) and Bolsheviks. The only power which recognized Estonia and Latvia at the time were two bandits – Lenin and Trotsky. The legitimacy of those ethnic states formed in the Russian lands is based on the original Leninist recognition.
In 1939 three by the then time fascist statelets signed pacts of mutual defense with the Soviet Union. In 1940 – at the time of spectacular Nazi successes – Soviet Union insisted on establishing military bases in fascist ethnic statelets of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. No a shot was fired. After situation in Europe escalated, Paris fell to the Nazis (was declared an open city), the Soviet Union forced what amounted to ultimatum to the fascist governments in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania and brought about replacement of fascist governments with left ones,which after the referendum joined the Soviet Union. During all this time not a bomb fell and not a shot was fired.
Although the incorporation of the Baltic Republics was lawful, legal, historically just (as it was Russian state's territory) and although ethnic states are abomination in and by themselves, and although the unification of Baltic Provinces and the USSR was recognized at Yalta, Potsdam and later Helsinki (On Security and Cooperation in Europe, Final Act of 1975 which recognized borders of the Soviet Union as unchangeable and legal as they were of August 1, 1975; recognized by the United States as well), after the dissolution of the Soviet Union the Nazi monster reared its ugly head again. After the defeat of Germany in 1945, the United States assumed on the role of the Third Reich in respect to anti-Communism, in certain ways Americanism is Nazism as foundation of American power in Europe was based not on forces which fought Nazism but precisely on those which were allied with the Nazism. Needless to say most enthusiastic supporters of the United States are Nazis, that is obvious especially in Eastern Europe, from Croatia to Estonia.
One of the most hideous propaganda myth was the notion spread by American State Department and the Nazis (literally Estonian and Latvian Nazis who fled the justice for the safety of American protection, as the USA was always willing to help Nazis as it was ready to help Islamists if the fight against Russia - or in fact any independent state - was at stake) that somehow three Baltic territories (now called Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) were occupied by the Soviet Union.
Of course Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania were never occupied by the Soviet Union, but as a justification for the theory the USA propagandists and the Nazis put forth a theory that the incorporation in the USSR was less than lawful because threat (!) of use of force (though no actual force) might have been used to induce the statelets to bring left governments into power and abolish native fascist regimes which the USA would have preferred then as it does now. In 2008 the United States Senate even demanded that Russia “recognizes occupation of the Baltic states” (Something Russia cannot possibly do because there was no occupation, this is American Nazi propaganda canard).
Indeed in 1969 the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties was signed. As far as I know I know all members of the NATO are signatories of the treaty. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties states explicitly that force or threat of use of force makes any international agreement void - Article 52 - Coercion of a State by the threat or use of force 247 A treaty is void if its conclusion has been procured by the threat or use of force. This means of course that all treaties and agreements the American Nazis and their European vassals have “reached” in, with or in respect to Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Ivory Coast, Haiti Yugoslavia (as a historic entity), Serbia, Kosovo (a part of Serbia illegally occupied by NATO at this time), Bosnia, etc. are not worth the paper they are written on.
Soviet Union did not occupy Baltic States and even if even used a threat of force, if there was any as there is no evidence of such threat , this was not illegal under international law of the late 1940s.
The USA occupies Iraq and Afghanistan and the USA has destroyed peaceful, prosperous state of Libya that was no threat to anyone. The regime that is about to seize control of Libya was brought in to power through murder, by American drones and NATO bombers.
Russian Federation should not allow this crime to go either unpunished or unnoticed.
Of course, Russian Federation is used almost metaphorically, someone has to come forward, the Republic of South Africa is also a great candidate to unify Africa, the world and deny Nazi rats and colonialists the legitimacy they seek.
1) Russia (or any other third country like China or Venezuela) should not approve any UN mandate for stabilizing Libya and should use it veto power if necessary to stop any UN resolution on Libya that might somehow abet or aid USA and NATO in their task of enslaving that African nation and stealing its natural resources.
2) The ongoing US/NATO aggression against Libya should be condemned. Unconditionally and without any reservations as of. The original UN mandate for protecting civilians and establishing a non-fly zone was misused and abused.
3) Russia, China and non-aligned states should organize a diplomatic effort to deny any recognition to the would-be government of thugs, murderers and rapists which “succeeded” in destroying Libya with the help of NATO air power.
4) A Libyan government in exile should be formed (perhaps in the Republic of South Africa) and it should be maintained that Libya is occupied. No elections which resulted in campaign of bombing and murder should be considered legitimate.
5) We need an international convention on anti-colonialism, analogues to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties that would deny legitimacy to governments formed by or outright imported by imperialist powers and deny any legitimacy to elections held under duress or in presence of foreign troops.
No comments:
Post a Comment